Home Senate Senate may challenge court verdict on Electoral Act, warns of negative precedence

Senate may challenge court verdict on Electoral Act, warns of negative precedence

The Upper Chamber of the National Assembly has warned that a crisis might be brewing if nothing is done to challenge the judgment of the Federal High Court sitting in Umuahia, which recently nullified the provisions of Section 84 (12) of the Electoral Act.

In a motion sponsored by Senator Thompson Sekibo (Rivers East), he described the judgment as a threat to the “legitimate functions” of the National Assembly.

The motion which got the support of 78 others Senators, cautioned that if the judgment is left unchallenged, “it will become a precedence on which any person approach the court and obtain judgment to ridicule the good intentions of the National Assembly as an institution.”

The lawmakers also criticised the non-involvement of the Senate in the suit, emphasizing the need for the Senate to “show concern on the judgment especially when it was not given opportunity to represent itself in a matter that emanates from her legitimate functions.”

Senator Sekibo said beyond laying a precedence for any person to use the court to ridicule the good intentions of the National Assembly as an institution; noted that, “the law was widely appreciated by the citizens of the country.”

Citing the sections of the 1999 Constitution relied upon by the Court in reaching the judgment, the motion explained that Sections 228 (a, b and d) of the Constitution “confers more powers on the National Assembly, particularly on political parties and effective management of the electoral process by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC).”

It further added that the meanings given to ‘civil service’ and ‘public service’ by Part IV of the Constitution is unambiguous, calling on the Court to set aside the judgment as it was reached “without due consideration of the Constitutional interpretation in Section 318 of the 1999 Constitution as amended.”

Recall that Justice Evelyn Anyadike of the Federal High Court sitting in Umuahia recently declared as null, void, illegal and unconstitutional, Section 84 (12) of the Electoral Act, 2022 as amended; and asked the Attorney General of the Federation (AGF) and Minister of Justice to expunge the affected section from the Electoral Act, 2022, as amended

Chinweuba Anyaragbuhttps://cdanewsonline.com
BEST SELLING BLOG THEME OF ALL TIMES. Follow us for more breaking news . Share,, like and Comment on our contents


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular

Shortage Of Foodstuff Hits Kaduna As Fuel Scarcity, New Naira Notes Linger

Kaduna State residents have raised the alarm over imminent hunger as fuel scarcity, new notes have affected the supply chain of foodstuff in the...

FEC Approves Contract For Oloibiri Museum And Research Centre

The Federal Government through the Federal Executive Council, FEC, has approved the award of Phase 1 engineering, procurement & construction contract for Oloibiri Museum...

I Hope Nothing Tampers With 2023 Elections – Obasanjo

Former President Olusegun Obasanjo is optimistic that nothing would interfere with the successful conduct of the 2023 general elections scheduled for February 25 and...


Secretary-GeneralThe Executives, BOT's and Members of Abia PDP VictoBOTvement have Congratulated Chief Okechukwu Ambrose Ahiwe on his successful emergency as the Governorship candidate of...

Recent Comments